NNEWSLIVE
HomeTechnologyFederal Regulator Intervenes in Arizona's Case Against Kalshi
Technology

Federal Regulator Intervenes in Arizona's Case Against Kalshi

A temporary restraining order has been issued to halt Arizona's criminal case against prediction market Kalshi. The move comes after the Commodity Futures Trading Commission intervened, citing concerns over state law conflicting with federal regulations.

M
Mehedi Hasan Sajal
April 12, 2026
1 min read

A federal regulator has stepped in to pause Arizona's criminal case against Kalshi, a prediction market company. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced it has secured a temporary restraining order, preventing the state from pursuing its case against Kalshi.

The CFTC's action follows Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes' decision to charge Kalshi with operating an unlicensed gambling business in the state. However, the CFTC argues that Arizona's move sets a dangerous precedent by using state criminal law against companies that comply with federal law.

"Arizona's decision to weaponize state criminal law against companies that comply with federal law sets a dangerous precedent, and the court's order today sends a clear message that intimidation is not an acceptable tactic to circumvent federal law," said CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig in a statement.

The temporary restraining order comes just days after a federal judge allowed Arizona's case to proceed. The CFTC has also filed suits to stop similar cases from moving forward in Connecticut and Illinois, indicating a broader effort to protect companies from conflicting state and federal regulations.

Background on the Case

Kalshi, whose CEO is Tarek Mansour, has been at the center of a dispute over the operation of prediction markets. The company has argued that it complies with federal law, while Arizona contends that it requires a state license to operate.

The CFTC's intervention highlights the ongoing tension between state and federal authorities over the regulation of emerging technologies and financial instruments. As the case unfolds, it may have significant implications for the broader tech industry and the role of federal regulators in overseeing state-level enforcement actions.

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation

Sign In

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

M
Written by

Mehedi Hasan Sajal

Staff writer covering breaking news, features, and long-form analysis for NewsLive. Tracking the stories that matter most.

Stay in the loop

Get the best stories
delivered weekly

Join thousands of readers who get our top stories in their inbox every week. No spam, unsubscribe any time.